A review of the BMW 118D was made in May this year on the car review channel, 'MOTLINE'.
As for the vehicle, the reviewer emphasized that it is a fun and fuel-efficient car.
And at the community site, the review was interested, but at that time I also saw this review and took a long time as the owner of the vehicle. I felt a bit different about some of the contents. I'm going to post it.
<By MOTline>
1. Mission reaction is not sporting. Mission is just plain... Is it about normal automation of other manufacturers?(15 minutes 30 seconds, 30 minutes 30 seconds, etc.)
As you know BMW develops engines directly and Mission writes from ZF.
This is because they are well aware that BMW's mission is not to create a mission, but rather to a more specialized specialist company, which results in better performance and in many respects.
In addition, it has a vast amount of data through cooperative work such as coordinating settings between the well-known engines that accumulated BMW's technology for a long time and ZF's mission, and this characteristic is that BMW purchases the mission from ZF The reason is that it produces better performance than other generic manufacturers.
It looks like the BMW 5 Series is showing its own lightweight movement despite the weight of a '1700kg' mid-size car (though it's lighter than a mid-sized car of the competition).
So, with a slightly lighter tolerance weight, the 118D seems to be a better representation of this balance, based on its lighter weight and better motion.
2. Due to the small size and lightness of the car, the light movement, auto-holding ability and braking ability are good. (About 16 minutes, about 20 minutes and 10 seconds)
The actual weight of the car is 1475 kilograms, not a very light car.
In my opinion, it is more appropriate to show light and agile movements because of the overall good balance characteristics rather than the characteristics of light weight.
It looks like the BMW 5 Series is showing its own lightweight movement despite the weight of a '1700kg' mid-size car (though it's lighter than a mid-sized car of the competition).
So, with a slightly lighter tolerance weight, the 118D seems to be a better representation of this balance, based on its lighter weight and better motion.
3. Mellow suspension?
The model that was reviewed was a model with 118D trim and M-Sport SUS with shadow trim.
As for the hardness of the suspension, M performance>> M sports> Generel.
It seems that it is not the slippery compared to the general model in general.
4. Is it not a sporty tire that looks like regular four seasons tires?(About 39 minutes and 50 seconds)
Also, the review vehicle is equipped with Bridgestone's S001 run-flat tire, and it is a tire with a sports propensity with its price point ...
In fact, it is a model that can feel the firmness and the holding of the roll when I replace the tire with the regular four seasons or winter tires.
I have written about the things I felt a little bit different and I agree with most of the other reviewers' evaluations.
댓글